<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Misc Law - Northern California Attorney Wallace Francis</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.wallacefrancis.com/category/misc-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.wallacefrancis.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 May 2017 22:11:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Court disregards DUI science</title>
		<link>https://www.wallacefrancis.com/court-disregards-dui-science/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wallace Francis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2014 04:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Misc Law]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wallacefrancis.com/?p=626</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[California Supreme Court Outlaws Science In DUI Cases Scientific evidence challenging the accuracy of breathalyzers is not admissible, California Supreme Court rules. Scientific evidence cannot be brought into evidence to challenge a borderline conviction for driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI) in California. The state Supreme Court last week rejected Terry Vangelder's attempt to  [...]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: small;"><b>California Supreme Court Outlaws Science In DUI Cases</b><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: small;"><i>Scientific evidence challenging the accuracy of breathalyzers is not admissible, California Supreme Court rules.</i></p>
<p></span><img decoding="async" alt="California Supreme Court" src="/rlc/pix/casupreme4.jpg" width="190" height="155" align="RIGHT" />Scientific evidence cannot be brought into evidence to challenge a borderline conviction for driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI) in California. The state Supreme Court last week rejected Terry Vangelder&#8217;s attempt to clear his name after he was arrested for drunk driving though he showed few signs of impairment in field sobriety tests.</p>
<p>California Highway Patrol Sergeant Richard W. Berg noticed Vangelder&#8217;s pickup truck driving at an alleged 125 MPH on Highway 163 in San Diego County on December 22, 2007. As soon as Sergeant Berg flipped on his overhead lights, Vangelder pulled over. Vangelder admitted to having a few glasses of wine with dinner, so he took and passed the field sobriety tests. Vangelder agreed to take a handheld Intoximeter Alco-Sensor IV preliminary alcohol screener test, which displayed a 0.086 blood alcohol content (BAC) reading. After this, he was arrested and taken to the county jail where an Intoximeter EC/IR breatalyzer produced an 0.08 BAC reading, right at the legal limit. He then took a blood test that reported a 0.087 BAC.</p>
<p>&#8220;I said I wanted to submit to a blood test,&#8221; Vangelder testified. &#8220;I didn&#8217;t think it was accurate. And the reason I say that is because I knew how much I had to drink.&#8221;</p>
<p>At trial, Vangelder called Dr. Michael P. Hlastala, a professor of medicine at the University of Washington, to testify. Hlastala is the author of a textbook and 170 peer-reviewed articles on the physiology of alcohol. He testified that the breath machines do not produce a scientifically reliable result. When he gave a very detailed explanation of how the machines fail to measure the alcohol content of deep lung air, the prosecutor objected and the jury was sent out of the courtroom.</p>
<p>&#8220;They are (inaccurate),&#8221; Dr. Hlastala testified before the judge. &#8220;And primarily because the basic assumption that all of the manufacturers have used is that the breath that <div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-1 fusion-flex-container hundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-overflow:visible;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap" style="width:calc( 100% + 0px ) !important;max-width:calc( 100% + 0px ) !important;margin-left: calc(-0px / 2 );margin-right: calc(-0px / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-0 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-flex-column fusion-flex-align-self-flex-start fusion-column-no-min-height" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:100%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:0px;--awb-margin-bottom-large:0px;--awb-spacing-left-large:0px;--awb-width-medium:100%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:0px;--awb-spacing-left-medium:0px;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:0px;--awb-spacing-left-small:0px;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column">[is] measured is directly related to water in the lungs, which is directly related to what&#8217;s in the blood. And in recent years, we&#8217;ve learned that, in fact, that&#8217;s not the case.&#8221;</p>
<p>The professor explained that the machine reading can change based on the speed and depth of breathing, body and breath temperature, and the ratio of red blood cells to total blood volume. These factors could lead to the reading either overstating or understating the true alcohol content of the blood.</p>
<p>&#8220;The question of whether the breath [sample and result] accurately reflects anything else is irrelevant,&#8221; the prosecutor countered.</p>
<p>The prosecution then moved to strike all of the expert witness testimony that would suggest there was something wrong with the way California drafted its laws. The trial judge ruled that general scientific arguments could not be made and that the defense could only present evidence that a particular machine had malfunctioned. Under a California law adopted in 1990, a motorist is guilty of DUI if he blows a 0.08 on a breath testing machine, regardless of whether he is physically impaired or not.</p>
<p>&#8220;As noted earlier, we explained in <i>Bransford</i>, that the 1990 amendment of the per se offense was specifically designed to obviate the need for conversion of breath results into blood results &#8212; and it rendered irrelevant and inadmissible defense expert testimony regarding partition ratio variability among different individuals or at different times for the same individual,&#8221; Chief Justice Tani Gorre Cantil-Sakauye wrote for the court. &#8220;Whether or not that part of expired breath accurately reflects the alcohol that is present only in the alveolar region of the lungs, the statutorily proscribed amount of alcohol in expired breath corresponds to the statutorily proscribed amount of alcohol in blood, as established by the per se statute.&#8221;</p>
<p>The high court explained that city, state and federal agencies around the country use and have tested the machines, and they work. The court argued the legislature took into account the way breath works when it passed the law to deny scientific challenges to the machines.</p>
<p>&#8220;We conclude that when the legislature employed the word &#8216;breath&#8217; in section 23152(b), it had in mind the air that is exhaled into a properly working and calibrated breath-testing machine,&#8221; Justice Cantil-Sakauye wrote. &#8220;Although Dr. Hlastala may hold scientifically based reservations concerning these legislative conclusions, we must defer to and honor the legislature&#8217;s reasonable determinations made in the course of its efforts to protect the safety and welfare of the public.&#8221;</p>
<p>The court found that the scientific evidence could be used to challenge a general DUI charge, but it could not be used to challenge the per se DUI charge.</p>
<p>A copy of the decision is available in a 350k PDF file at the source link below.</p>
<p><a name="source"></a>Source: <img decoding="async" alt="PDF File" src="/rlc/pix/pdf-mini.gif" width="15" height="16" /> <a title="View the original source article" href="/rlc/docs/2013/ca-noscience.pdf">California v. Vangelder</a>  (California Supreme Court, 11/21/2013)</span></div></div></div></div></p><p>The post <a href="https://www.wallacefrancis.com/court-disregards-dui-science/">Court disregards DUI science</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.wallacefrancis.com">Northern California Attorney Wallace Francis</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>False imprisonment by store security or night club security is common</title>
		<link>https://www.wallacefrancis.com/false-imprisonment-by-store-security-or-night-club-security-is-common/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wallace Francis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 15:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Misc Law]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wallacefrancis.com/?p=277</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Retailers and night club owners have the right to protect their property and patrons from criminal activity. In the case of retailers, a store owner has what is called the "shopkeepers privilege". This allows the store security to detain you for a reasonable period of time if they have reasonably believed a crime occurred. However,  [...]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Retailers and night club owners have the right to protect their property and patrons from criminal activity.  In the case of retailers, a store owner has what is called the <a href="http://public.findlaw.com/abaflg/flg-14-4-9.html">&#8220;shopkeepers privilege&#8221;</a>.  This allows the store security to detain you for a reasonable period of time if they have reasonably believed a crime occurred. </p>
<p>However, in the context of such situations, poorly trained security officers can falsely imprison customers who have done nothing wrong.  In one of my cases, the defendant was offered a sample from an employee who spoke very little English.  He was subsequently physically taken from the front of the store, in front of his fiance and handcuffed in the security office.  This is <a href="http://www.shouselaw.com/false_imprisonment.html">false imprisonment</a>.  </p>
<p>Because the officer did not bother to check and see whether the sample was free, or even speak with the employee, the store is probably now looking at <a href="http://docs.google.com/gview?a=v&#038;q=cache:hJnmyYgRH2cJ:www.enterprisecounsel.com/newspub/advisories/pdf/FivePitfallsofMaliciousProsecutionLitigation2003.pdf+liability+of+district+attorney+for+malicious+prosecution&#038;hl=en&#038;sig=AFQjCNHGoi54DWVCjD-0308XV4uqp0WhhA">substantial liability</a> on their part.  To exacerbate the matter, the District Attorney of that County filed criminal charges against the customer, based upon the report of the security officer.  The police were never called.</p><p>The post <a href="https://www.wallacefrancis.com/false-imprisonment-by-store-security-or-night-club-security-is-common/">False imprisonment by store security or night club security is common</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.wallacefrancis.com">Northern California Attorney Wallace Francis</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>California self-defense and martial arts training</title>
		<link>https://www.wallacefrancis.com/california-self-defense-and-martial-arts-training/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wallace Francis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 16:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Misc Law]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wallacefrancis.com/?p=268</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[With the ever-rising popularity of MMA (Mixed-martial arts) it is likely that more and more criminal cases will be prosecuted in which the victims and/or perpetrators will have had some level of training. It is important to understand that, to quote self-defense expert Animal MacYoung, "The problem with self-defense training is 1) that it doesn't  [...]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the ever-rising popularity of MMA (Mixed-martial arts) it is likely that more and more criminal cases will be prosecuted in which the victims and/or perpetrators will have had some level of training.  It is important to understand that, to quote self-defense expert Animal MacYoung, &#8220;The problem with self-defense training is 1) that it doesn&#8217;t work and 2) that it does work&#8221;.</p>
<p>I am not trying to be funny when I say that, and neither was he.  The psychology of self-defense is an enormous, complex area and the law is as well.  All the training in the world will not protect you from facing criminal charges if you have committed acts construed as criminal by the police and DA&#8217;s.  </p>
<p>First, it is a myth that a trained martial artist must be registered as a deadly weapon, or for that matter, that their hands and feet are considered deadly weapons.  Yet martial arts training in California is taken into account when the question of self-defense is raised.</p>
<p>You are allowed to physically defend yourself with only that amount of force that is reasonably necessary to do so.  If a drunk at a bar grabs your girlfriend, you are not allowed to &#8220;ground and pound&#8221; them like an MMA fighter.  Once the engagement breaks off, you are not allowed to continue it, and you are not allowed to escalate the matter further.  If a highly-trained fighter is in a confrontation with a drunken car mechanic who can barely stand up, it&#8217;s going to be difficult for you to argue self-defense.  That is why, on the continuum of self-defense acts, someone with training is a lot better off staying out of trouble.  </p>
<p>A good example of clearly felony assault is the case of <a href="http://www.bullshido.net/forums/showthread.php?t=88535">Bobby Joe Blythe</a> a former martial arts instructor who recently posted a video of one of his students attacking and seriously injuring a man who appears mentally disturbed.  </p>
<p>The point at which the victim says &#8220;You got it&#8221; is where the perpetrator has no claim to self-defense whatsoever.  This is important to understand.  If the fight is over, then it is over.</p><p>The post <a href="https://www.wallacefrancis.com/california-self-defense-and-martial-arts-training/">California self-defense and martial arts training</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.wallacefrancis.com">Northern California Attorney Wallace Francis</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sonoma County DMV hearings and DUI</title>
		<link>https://www.wallacefrancis.com/sonoma-county-dmv-hearings-and-dui/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wallace Francis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 22:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Misc Law]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wallacefrancis.com/?p=262</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If you have been arrested in Sonoma County for DUI, you will almost certainly be charged with the crime of driving under the influence, and your name forwarded to the California Department of Motor Vehicles. Thus, your case will go forward in two different avenues, the criminal court and the administrative arm of the DMV  [...]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you have been arrested in Sonoma County for DUI, you will almost certainly be charged with the crime of driving under the influence, and your name forwarded to the California Department of Motor Vehicles.</p>
<p>Thus, your case will go forward in two different avenues, the criminal court and the administrative arm of the DMV that deals with these matters.</p>
<p>Your license is a privilege, not a right.  That means that the laws and standards are vastly different.  Most importantly, YOU HAVE ONLY TEN DAYS TO REQUEST A DMV HEARING BEFORE YOUR LICENSE IS SUSPENDED AUTOMATICALLY.  Yes, you read that correctly.  Ten days.</p>
<p>The following is an excerpt from the California Department of Motor Vehicles Website<a href="http://www.dmv.ca.gov/dl/driversafety/dsadminvscriminal.htm#diff"> which you can find here</a>.</p>
<p>&#8220;How is the DMV hearing different from the court trial for DUI?</p>
<p>The DMV hearing is an administrative proceeding regarding your driving privilege and the circumstances surrounding the arrest, not whether you are innocent or guilty of a criminal act. Only the following issues will be discussed:</p>
<p>If you took a blood or breath or (if applicable) a urine test:</p>
<p>    * Did the peace officer have reasonable cause to believe you were driving a motor vehicle in violation of Vehicle Code Section 23140 , 23152 , or 23153 ?<br />
    * Were you placed under lawful arrest?<br />
    * Were you driving a motor vehicle when you had 0.08% or more by weight of alcohol in your blood?</p>
<p>If you refused or failed to complete a blood, breath test, or (if applicable) a urine test:</p>
<p>    * Did the peace officer have reasonable cause to believe you were driving a motor vehicle in violation of Vehicle Code Section 23140 , 23152 , or, 23153 ?<br />
    * Were you placed under lawful arrest?<br />
    * Were you told that if you refused to submit to or failed to complete a test of your blood, breath, or (when applicable) urine, your driving privilege would be suspended for one year or revoked for two or three years?<br />
    * Did you refuse to submit to or failed to complete a blood or breath test, or (if applicable) a urine test after being requested to do so by a peace officer?&#8221;</p>
<p>Only an attorney is qualified to sort out all of the issues in this situation by examining the police report and any other evidence.  Having your license suspended can be extremely damaging to your life.  If you are a professional driver, then that makes it that much more important to get legal help.</p><p>The post <a href="https://www.wallacefrancis.com/sonoma-county-dmv-hearings-and-dui/">Sonoma County DMV hearings and DUI</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.wallacefrancis.com">Northern California Attorney Wallace Francis</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arrested by the police?</title>
		<link>https://www.wallacefrancis.com/arrested-by-the-police/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wallace Francis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 16:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Misc Law]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wallacefrancis.com/?p=229</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If you have been arrested by the police, more than likely you are going to have a lot of questions. That is why it is important to understand the process.  A misdemeanor is a crime that is punishable by a sentence of  less than a year in prison.   A felony is a crime that is  [...]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you have been arrested by the police, more than likely you are going to have a lot of questions.  That is why it is important to understand the process.  A <em>misdemeanor </em>is a crime that is punishable by a sentence of  less than a year in prison.   A <em>felony</em> is a crime that is punishable by more than one year.  Misdemeanors commonly end up with the defendant, if convicted, serving probation or a short jail term depending upon the crime and whether there is a previous criminal record.</p>
<p>1. The first step is your <em>arraignment.</em> An arraignment is your first court date, where your rights are explained to you and the charges which have been filed against you are presented to the court.  The best thing to do, if you don&#8217;t have a lawyer, is explain to the court that you would like to get one.  They will more than likely give you time for that.  You should be aware that the District Attorney will likely ask for the harshest penalty possible when charging the crime.</p>
<p>2. You attorney will more than likely enter a plea of not guilty, waive time, and set the matter for another hearing while he or she explores the facts of the case and determines whether or not you can mount a real defense to the crime.  By waiving time that means you are giving up your right to a speedy trial so your lawyer can investigate the facts.</p>
<p>3. Next, many attorneys file pre-trial motions, such as a Motion to Suppress Evidence under Evidence Code 1538.5.  If there has been a violation of your rights, then evidence may have been illegally obtained and then cannot be used against you at trial.  This may lead to the dismissal of the charges.</p>
<p>4. Finally comes the trial.  The District Attorney presents his case and evidence against you, and you will be tried by either a judge or a jury.  Many times if there is a weakness in the case, there will be a deal before trial or an outright dismissal.  Unlike television, it tends to be far less dramatic and far more technical, with a layperson not understanding a lot of what is happening.</p>
<p>If you are convicted of a criminal offense, the results can be devastating.  It may make it difficult for you to get certain jobs, may effect your credibility if you ever testify in court on behalf of another person, or even effect your business as often people doing business will check on such things.</p>
<p>Even if you feel like your certain to be convicted, it is doubtful that you have the information and knowledge to make that determination.  If you were sick you wouldn&#8217;t diagnose and treat yourself.  Why would you handle your own criminal case?</p>
<p>The fact is that an attorney can at the very least give you the peace of mind knowing that you had your case examined and that you did everything you could to fight it.  There is no shortage of people why come into my office with previous cases that might have had a different outcome if they had an attorney from the start.</p><p>The post <a href="https://www.wallacefrancis.com/arrested-by-the-police/">Arrested by the police?</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.wallacefrancis.com">Northern California Attorney Wallace Francis</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Persons convicted of domestic violence lose child custody</title>
		<link>https://www.wallacefrancis.com/persons-convicted-of-domestic-violence-lose-child-custody/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wallace Francis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 04:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Misc Law]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wallacefrancis.com/?p=210</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[California Family Code Section 3044 3044. "(a) Upon a finding by the court that a party seeking custody of a child has perpetrated domestic violence against the other party seeking custody of the child or against the child or the child's siblings within the previous five years, there is a rebuttable presumption that an award of sole or  [...]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>California Family Code Section 3044</p>
<p>3044.  &#8220;(a) Upon a finding by the court that a party seeking custody of a child has perpetrated domestic violence against the other party seeking custody of the child or against the child or the child&#8217;s siblings within the previous five years, there is a rebuttable presumption that an award of sole or joint physical or legal custody of a child to a person who has perpetrated domestic violence is detrimental to the best interest of the child, pursuant to Section 3011.  This presumption may only be rebutted by a preponderance of the evidence.&#8221;</p>
<p>That means that if you are convicted of domestic violence, then the odds are stacked against you and more than likely you will lose total custody of your child. Someone who violently attacks a partner deserves to lose custody, and despite the harsh penalties, violence against partners continues.</p>
<p>Of course, not everyone who is accused of domestic violence is guilty of it. Fabricated allegations of child abuse and domestic violence are a common method for a partner to gain the upper hand in a contested divorce. This, of course, hurts people are really are victims of domestic violence because it takes valuable police time and court time to sort out the false charges from the real ones.</p>
<p>Many times, the accuser can actually be the assailant in the crime because a person defending themselves can leave bruises or marks while the perpetrator of the crime was unable to do so.  Without an attorney who has the time to understand your case, investigate the crime, and bring forward all the evidence, a victim can not only end up with a criminal record, but lose all parental rights.</p><p>The post <a href="https://www.wallacefrancis.com/persons-convicted-of-domestic-violence-lose-child-custody/">Persons convicted of domestic violence lose child custody</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.wallacefrancis.com">Northern California Attorney Wallace Francis</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hit &#038; Run: California Penal Code 20001</title>
		<link>https://www.wallacefrancis.com/hit-run-california-penal-code-20001/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wallace Francis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 15:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Misc Law]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overnightwebsite.net/?p=131</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The driver of any vehicle involved in an accident resulting in injury to any person, other than himself or herself, or in the death of any person shall immediately stop the vehicle at the scene of the accident. Any person who violates this law shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison, or in  [...]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px;">The driver of any vehicle involved in an accident resulting in injury to any person, other than himself or herself, or in the death of any person shall immediately stop the vehicle at the scene of the accident. Any person who violates this law shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison, or in a county jail for not more than one year, or by a fine of not less than $1,000 nor more than $10,000, or by both that imprisonment and fine. If the accident results in death or permanent, serious injury, any person who violates this law shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for two, three, or four years, or in a county jail for not less than 90 days nor more than one year, or by a fine of not less than $1,000 nor more than $10,000, or by both that imprisonment and fine. However, the court, in the interests of justice and for reasons stated in the record, may reduce or eliminate the minimum imprisonment required by this paragraph.</span></p><p>The post <a href="https://www.wallacefrancis.com/hit-run-california-penal-code-20001/">Hit & Run: California Penal Code 20001</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.wallacefrancis.com">Northern California Attorney Wallace Francis</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sex Offender Law: Unfair</title>
		<link>https://www.wallacefrancis.com/sex-offender-law-unfair/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wallace Francis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 15:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Misc Law]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overnightwebsite.net/?p=129</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Fourth District Court of Appeal in Santa Ana ruled Wednsday that Prop. 83, which prevented sex offenders from living 2.000 feet from a school or park is punitive in nature and therefore retroactively would punish sex offenders who would be forced out of their homes.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Fourth District Court of Appeal in Santa Ana ruled Wednsday that Prop. 83, which prevented sex offenders from living 2.000 feet from a school or park is punitive in nature and therefore retroactively would punish sex offenders who would be forced out of their homes.</p><p>The post <a href="https://www.wallacefrancis.com/sex-offender-law-unfair/">Sex Offender Law: Unfair</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.wallacefrancis.com">Northern California Attorney Wallace Francis</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yount Vs. City Of Sacremento</title>
		<link>https://www.wallacefrancis.com/yount-vs-city-of-sacremento/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wallace Francis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 15:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Misc Law]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overnightwebsite.net/?p=127</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A recent California Supreme Court decision has allowed an arrested person who was shot in the buttocks while resisting arrest to file a civil complaint despite his conviction. Sacramento Police officers arrested Yount on suspicion of drunk driving. An officer mistakenly pulled out his pistol instead of his taser and shot Yount once in the  [...]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A recent California Supreme Court decision has allowed an arrested person who was shot in the buttocks while resisting arrest to file a civil complaint despite his conviction. Sacramento Police officers arrested Yount on suspicion of drunk driving. An officer mistakenly pulled out his pistol instead of his taser and shot Yount once in the buttocks. Yount entered a plea of no contest to resisting arrest under PC 148.<br style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px;" /><br style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px;" />The essence of the majority decision rested upon the notion that because Yount&#8217;s resistance did not justify the use of deadly force, Yount&#8217;s claim was not barred.<br style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px;" /><br style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px;" />-source Metropolitan News-Enterprise</p><p>The post <a href="https://www.wallacefrancis.com/yount-vs-city-of-sacremento/">Yount Vs. City Of Sacremento</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.wallacefrancis.com">Northern California Attorney Wallace Francis</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are High Profile Murders With Juvenile Suspects Part Of A Trend?</title>
		<link>https://www.wallacefrancis.com/are-high-profile-murders/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wallace Francis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 02:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Misc Law]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overnightwebsite.net/?p=15</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Are high profile murders with juvenile suspects part of a trend? Steven Mayer, The Bakersfield Californian Dec. 6--The headlines earlier this year were enough to leave an entire community shaken: Five boys, some as young as 13, accused in beating death of 81-year-old man. Then it happened again: Two teens charged in stabbing death of  [...]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">Are high profile murders with juvenile suspects part of a trend?</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">Steven Mayer, The Bakersfield Californian</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">Dec. 6&#8211;The headlines earlier this year were enough to leave an entire community shaken:</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">Five boys, some as young as 13, accused in beating death of 81-year-old man. Then it happened again:</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">Two teens charged in stabbing death of elderly couple in southwest Bakersfield. When underage boys &#8212; and sometimes girls &#8212; commit violent and serious felonies, communities struggle to respond. Some say it&#8217;s a symptom of a sick society where violent video games, single-parent families and glorification of gang culture have become commonplace. Others say shocking crimes committed by children are nothing new and still relatively rare, and that the advent of a new juvenile crime wave is not in evidence.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">PROSECUTING KIDS One thing is certain. The Kern County District Attorney&#8217;s office is prosecuting more juvenile offenders as adults than before.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">In the past year, the number of kids charged as adults increased exponentially. In 2006 there were nine. Last year the number of juveniles charged as adults was 52, according to statistics from the Kern County Probation Department&#8217;s juvenile division. Overall the numbers are growing as well.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">Two years ago, about 17,000 minors faced possible criminal charges in Kern County. Two years later, that number had jumped by 11.8 percent. That&#8217;s not just population growth. During the same years, Kern&#8217;s juvenile population increased by just 2.3 percent, according to the U.S. Census.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">BEHIND THE NUMBERS Much of the increase in kids being charged as adults can be attributed to a policy decision inside the DA&#8217;s office to take a harder line against juvenile offenders viewed as violent, serious or habitual, said Michael Vendrasco, the deputy district attorney who supervises the prosecution of juveniles in Kern County.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">But Vendrasco sees other reasons for the increase as well. &#8220;Some crimes just stand out,&#8221; Vendrasco said.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">&#8220;The public is concerned,&#8221; he added. &#8220;There are neighborhoods out there where the streets are not safe.&#8221; Defense attorneys say high-profile juvenile crimes that garner a lot of attention in the news media do not justify the conclusion that there&#8217;s a statistical increase in violent juvenile crime. In fact, juvenile crime has been dropping statewide.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">In a 10-year period ending in 2005, the number of juvenile felony arrests fell by one-third, even as the population of juveniles in California increased by some 24 percent, according to a state analysis. &#8220;Statistically, you can demonstrate a decrease in juvenile crime,&#8221; said Kern County Public Defender Mark Arnold.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">The increase in the number of juveniles prosecuted as adults is strictly a result of decisions made in the DA&#8217;s office, Arnold said. &#8220;It&#8217;s not a direct reflection of an increase in the number of juvenile offenses,&#8221; he said.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">Criminal Law Blog</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">UNLAWFUL DETAINERS AND STALKERS/DOMESTIC VIOLENCE</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">Residential tenancies and domestic violence: AB 2052 effective 9-27-08 adds CC section 1946.7 which 1) authorizes tenant to notify landlord that tenant or household member was victim of domestic violence, sexual assault, or stalking, and that the tenant intends to terminate the tenancy, 2) requires notice in writing (to be given within 60 days of date of order or officer&#8217;s report, or within time period set forth in CC Section 1946 <div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-2 fusion-flex-container hundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-overflow:visible;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap" style="width:calc( 100% + 0px ) !important;max-width:calc( 100% + 0px ) !important;margin-left: calc(-0px / 2 );margin-right: calc(-0px / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-1 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-flex-column fusion-flex-align-self-flex-start fusion-column-no-min-height" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:100%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:0px;--awb-margin-bottom-large:0px;--awb-spacing-left-large:0px;--awb-width-medium:100%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:0px;--awb-spacing-left-medium:0px;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:0px;--awb-spacing-left-small:0px;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column">[renewable hiring of real property: notice of termination]), along with attached copy of TRO or protective iorder, or written report of investigation police officer; 3) provides that tenant will be responsible for payment of rent for 30 days following notice (or as stated in CC section 1946; prorated if premises rented to another party), but willbe release from further liability and 4) specifies that only the victim is relieved from obligation.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">also CCP 1161 is amended to add a list of acts constituting unlawful detainer by creating a rebuttable presumption affecting the burden of proof that person who commits act of domestic violence, sexual assault, or stalking has committed a nuisance upon the premises.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">Nov.20, 2008</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">YOUNT V. CITY OF SACRAMENTO</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">A recent California Supreme Court decision has allowed an arrested person who was shot in the buttocks while resisting arrest to file a civil complaint despite his conviction. Sacramento Police officers arrested Yount on suspicion of drunk driving. An officer mistakenly pulled out his pistol instead of his taser and shot Yount once in the buttocks. Yount entered a plea of no contest to resisting arrest under PC 148.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">The essence of the majority decision rested upon the notion that because Yount&#8217;s resistance did not justify the use of deadly force, Yount&#8217;s claim was not barred.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">-source Metropolitan News-Enterprise</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">SEX-OFFENDER LAW UNFAIR</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">The Fourth District Court of Appeal in Santa Ana ruled Wednsday that Prop.83, which prevented sex offenders from living 2.000 feet from a school or park is punitive in nature and therefore retroactively would punish sex offenders who would be forced out of their homes.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">HIT AND RUN</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">California Penal Code 20001:</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">The driver of any vehicle involved in an accident resulting in injury to any person, other than himself or herself, or in the death of any person shall immediately stop the vehicle at the scene of the accident. Any person who violates this law shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison, or in a county jail for not more than one year, or by a fine of not less than $1,000 nor more than $10,000, or by both that imprisonment and fine. If the accident results in death or permanent, serious injury, any person who violates this law shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for two, three, or four years, or in a county jail for not less than 90 days nor more than one year, or by a fine of not less than $1,000 nor more than $10,000, or by both that imprisonment and fine. However, the court, in the interests of justice and for reasons stated in the record, may reduce or eliminate the minimum imprisonment required by this paragraph.</div>
<p>From: Steven Mayer, The Bakersfield Californian<br />
Dec. 6&#8211;The headlines earlier this year were enough to leave an entire community shaken:</p>
<p>Five boys, some as young as 13, accused in beating death of 81-year-old man. Then it happened again:</p>
<p>Two teens charged in stabbing death of elderly couple in southwest Bakersfield. When underage boys &#8212; and sometimes girls &#8212; commit violent and serious felonies, communities struggle to respond. Some say it&#8217;s a symptom of a sick society where violent video games, single-parent families and glorification of gang culture have become commonplace. Others say shocking crimes committed by children are nothing new and still relatively rare, and that the advent of a new juvenile crime wave is not in evidence.</p>
<p>PROSECUTING KIDS One thing is certain. The Kern County District Attorney&#8217;s office is prosecuting more juvenile offenders as adults than before.</p>
<p>In the past year, the number of kids charged as adults increased exponentially. In 2006 there were nine. Last year the number of juveniles charged as adults was 52, according to statistics from the Kern County Probation Department&#8217;s juvenile division. Overall the numbers are growing as well.</p>
<p>Two years ago, about 17,000 minors faced possible criminal charges in Kern County. Two years later, that number had jumped by 11.8 percent. That&#8217;s not just population growth. During the same years, Kern&#8217;s juvenile population increased by just 2.3 percent, according to the U.S. Census.</p>
<p>BEHIND THE NUMBERS Much of the increase in kids being charged as adults can be attributed to a policy decision inside the DA&#8217;s office to take a harder line against juvenile offenders viewed as violent, serious or habitual, said Michael Vendrasco, the deputy district attorney who supervises the prosecution of juveniles in Kern County.</p>
<p>But Vendrasco sees other reasons for the increase as well. &#8220;Some crimes just stand out,&#8221; Vendrasco said.</p>
<p>&#8220;The public is concerned,&#8221; he added. &#8220;There are neighborhoods out there where the streets are not safe.&#8221; Defense attorneys say high-profile juvenile crimes that garner a lot of attention in the news media do not justify the conclusion that there&#8217;s a statistical increase in violent juvenile crime. In fact, juvenile crime has been dropping statewide.</p>
<p>In a 10-year period ending in 2005, the number of juvenile felony arrests fell by one-third, even as the population of juveniles in California increased by some 24 percent, according to a state analysis. &#8220;Statistically, you can demonstrate a decrease in juvenile crime,&#8221; said Kern County Public Defender Mark Arnold.</p>
<p>The increase in the number of juveniles prosecuted as adults is strictly a result of decisions made in the DA&#8217;s office, Arnold said. &#8220;It&#8217;s not a direct reflection of an increase in the number of juvenile offenses,&#8221; he said.</div></div></div></div></p><p>The post <a href="https://www.wallacefrancis.com/are-high-profile-murders/">Are High Profile Murders With Juvenile Suspects Part Of A Trend?</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.wallacefrancis.com">Northern California Attorney Wallace Francis</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
